If you want to control decision making in thousands and millions of minds generating individual and public opinion as sum of individual opinion you have to control the sources of informations and you have to control the kind of sanction the individual faces after making his or her decision. The sanctions do base on public opinion and can be benefitial to the individual or a punishment. Controlling the information sources and the reglementation of the outcoming decision making gives you the power to control public opinion. An individual can only decide on the basis of the information already gathered. This means you will win if you control most or all the information available, excluding unwanted informations and if you control the timeline of informations going back one or two generations. This would give you the power to control history perception and the awarness of future generations. Especially when the original witnesses are dead you can generate artificial history turning it into history perception of most of the people in your target area. You can never control all individuals accepting your vision. But you can sanction different versions and ideas.
This can be social pressure ( exclusion from activieties, groups and other boundaries), violence by fellow individuals ( using emotions and morality to regulate his or her behavior) or justice ( implenting laws that criminalize unwanted behavior and lead to punishment from social service up to death).
Once implemented the system works on itself only needing some adjustment from time to time while the individuals are reglementing each other. This can be for the benefit of a society and for the opposite.
I will document the RU and US opinion making on that in Germany on two examples. The author does not support any of the named parties. The two examples will be the reeducation of Nazi-Germany after WWII up to now and MH 17 as modern example explaining modus operandi.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen